SKIP TO CONTENT
By Eric Croak · Updated April 29, 2026
You have a financial advisor. Chances are, you have a trusted CPA. Maybe an estate attorney, too. You’ve done everything a responsible person does when real wealth is at stake.
And yet, every spring, the tax return is completed and the number feels off. Not wrong in a way you can point to. But in the way that makes you wonder whether the people you’re paying are working together—or just working.
We hear this from families all the time. And the answer is almost never what people expect.
It’s rare that your financial advisor is doing poor work or that your CPA isn’t competent. The problem is almost always structural. It’s the gap between your advisors—the space that nobody formally owns—that tends to cost the most money.
The Problem Isn’t Who You Hired
Here’s what makes this so frustrating: each of your advisors is probably doing their job well. Your investment advisor manages the portfolio. Your CPA prepares the return. Your estate attorney drafts the documents. None of them is dropping the ball in their own lane.
But when a decision in one part of your financial life quietly creates a problem in another, it tends to go unnoticed and unaddressed. Until it shows up as a surprise in April.
The issue isn’t competence. It’s coordination.
For households with real complexity—multiple income sources, real estate, business interests, retirement accounts, and trusts—the cost of that disconnection tends to build in the background for years before it shows up clearly in a single tax return.
What This Looks Like in Practice
These scenarios follow predictable patterns. Most of them involve decisions that were reasonable in isolation and costly in combination.
Scenario 1: Roth Conversion Meets Real Estate Sale
A Roth conversion happens in the same year as a real estate sale, large portfolio gains, or elevated business income.
Individually, each decision makes sense. Together, they can push income into a higher bracket and produce a tax bill no one anticipated.
The problem isn’t that the information wasn’t available. It’s that no one put it together before the conversion happened.
If your investment advisor and your CPA had spoken directly mid-year, one of them likely would have caught it in time.
Scenario 2: Capital Gains Without Loss Harvesting
Your portfolio generated significant capital gains during the year. Very few losses were harvested to offset them.
Tax-loss harvesting is a straightforward strategy: sell underperforming positions to offset realized gains while staying within wash-sale rules. Your investment advisor understands it. Your CPA understands the value. But without coordination in real time against the full picture of the year’s gains and losses, the opportunity is often missed—or captured only partially at year-end, when the market may no longer cooperate.
Scenario 3: The PTET Election That Got Missed
If you own a pass-through business in a state that offers a pass-through entity tax election, you may have access to one of the more valuable tax tools available to business owners.
The Pass-Through Entity Tax (PTET) allows eligible businesses to pay state income taxes at the entity level rather than the individual level, creating a federal deduction that effectively works around the individual State and Local Tax (SALT) cap.
But these elections are state-specific, deadline-driven, and require coordination between your CPA and your business structure. When advisors aren’t sharing information, elections like this get missed—and in many cases, there’s no way to go back and fix it.
Scenario 4: Deferred Retirement Balances and the Required Minimum Distribution (RMD) Cascade
Large traditional IRA or old 401(k) balances represent a future tax bill most people underestimate. Every dollar in those accounts will eventually be taxed as ordinary income.
When required minimum distributions begin at age 73, that added income can push you into higher tax brackets, trigger higher Medicare premiums under Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA), increase taxes on your Social Security benefits, and expose investment income to the 3.8% net investment income tax.
Whether a Roth conversion makes sense depends on your full income picture—current and projected tax brackets, real estate plans, Medicare timing, and business income variability. When those inputs aren’t aligned, conversions either don’t happen, happen at the wrong amount, or happen in the wrong year.
“The goal isn’t minimizing this year’s tax bill. It’s controlling the total tax bill your family pays over decades.”
Why This Pattern Keeps Repeating
Most advisory teams come together gradually. A CPA comes first, often long before things get complicated. An investment advisor joins later. An estate attorney is brought in for something specific. Nobody designed this as a system. It just grew.
No one assigned responsibility for what happens at the intersections—the decisions that touch tax, investments, and estate planning at the same time. Each advisor is focused on doing their job well. Nobody owns the full picture.
This isn’t a failure of individual professionals. It’s a structural gap.
Coordination is the one function that captures the most value—and the one nobody is formally responsible for.
What a Coordinated Team Does Differently
The difference isn’t a different roster of advisors. It’s a different process—one where the right information gets to the right people before decisions are made, not after.
Mid-Year Tax Projections
Your investment advisor and CPA speak directly before significant portfolio decisions are made—not through you, and not after 1099s arrive. By the third quarter, they share a clear view of where your income and tax position are headed, while there’s still time to act.
Systematic Tax-Loss Harvesting
Tax-loss harvesting happens throughout the year, based on real-time monitoring of the portfolio against market conditions—not as a December afterthought.
Roth Conversions Calibrated Against the Full Picture
Conversion decisions reflect your entire financial situation—real estate activity, Medicare timing, projected RMDs, and business income—not just the retirement account in isolation.
Elections and Deadlines That Actually Get Filed
PTET elections and other strategies get executed correctly because someone is responsible for tracking what applies, what matters, and when action is required.
Three Questions to Ask Your Advisory Team
Before assuming your advisors are the problem, these three questions can quickly reveal whether the issue is structural:
- In the past year, did your investment advisor and your CPA speak directly to each other about your projected tax position before any significant decisions were made? (Working through you doesn’t count.)
- Can anyone on your team tell you—without asking you to gather information—what your estimated tax liability looks like for the current year?
- Is there one person on your team who has a complete, integrated view of your investment accounts, retirement accounts, real estate, and business interests—not just the portion they personally manage?
If the honest answer to any of these is no, that’s not a reflection on any individual advisor. It’s a structural gap—and structural gaps have real costs.
What Closing the Gap Actually Requires
The answer isn’t to replace your advisors or add more of them.
It’s to establish a single point of accountability—someone responsible for maintaining a complete view of your financial picture and making sure the right people are talking to each other at the right times.
In practice, that means running a detailed tax projection in the third quarter while there’s still time to act. It means ensuring your investment advisor and CPA are aligned before major decisions are made, tracking elections and deadlines, and seeing that they’re executed correctly.
For families with real complexity—multiple income sources, appreciated real estate, business interests, or substantial retirement balances—the value of that coordination typically exceeds what any single strategy can deliver on its own.
Not because the strategies are complicated.
But because they only work when they’re working together.
Start the Conversation
If your tax bill has consistently felt higher than it should, despite having good people in place, this is usually why.
At Croak Capital, we focus on coordinating the full financial picture for clients with complex situations. If you’d like, we’ll take a clear, objective look at how your current advisory structure is working—and where gaps may be costing you money.
Contact us to schedule an exploratory call.
Frequently asked questions:
Because most financial advisors manage investments, and most CPAs prepare returns. Very few coordinate both in real time.
Tax-loss harvesting involves selling underperforming positions to offset realized gains. Timing matters because opportunities depend on market conditions and wash-sale rules. Waiting until year-end often means the window has already closed.
IRMAA is an income-based surcharge on Medicare premiums. Events like Roth conversions or large RMDs can push income above certain thresholds. Coordinating the timing and size of those events can help reduce or avoid the surcharge.
Not necessarily. Deferral works when you expect lower tax rates later. But for many high-income households, it can lead to higher future brackets and larger RMDs. The goal is lifetime tax efficiency—not just a lower bill this year.
A coordinated team has one person responsible for the full picture—ensuring your advisors are aligned, information is shared in advance, and decisions are made with your entire financial situation in mind.
Also Read:
How to invest $5M+ after selling my company: Do I need a family office
Why Ann Arbor Professionals Should Work with a Fiduciary Financial Advisor
Risks of keeping $5M+ in one bank: how do UHNW families manage wealth safely
What a Fiduciary Approach Means for Post-Exit Entrepreneurs and High-Net-Worth Families